# SPDR MSCI ACWI All World Fund Now Available

**URL:** <https://community.investengine.com/t/spdr-msci-acwi-all-world-fund-now-available/1892>\
**Category:** General\
**Created:** [28 September 2024 09:24 UTC](https://community.investengine.com/t/spdr-msci-acwi-all-world-fund-now-available/1892 "2024-09-28T09:24:54Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 8\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gandalf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/59ef9b/32.png) [@Gandalf](https://community.investengine.com/u/Gandalf)\
**Post date:** [28 September 2024 09:24 UTC](https://community.investengine.com/t/spdr-msci-acwi-all-world-fund-now-available/1892/1 "2024-09-28T09:24:55Z")

</div>

Cheapest MSCI All- World Accumulating Index tracker now available, OCF of 0.12% and a typical spread of 0.05%.  
Next competitive fund is Invesco Ftse All-World with an OCF of 0.15%.  
I am going to add this to my VUAG and XNAQ and FWRG unds, to hedge my bets. Fund overlap doesn’t concern me, strong returns do.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scarface](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e56c9b/32.png) [@Scarface](https://community.investengine.com/u/Scarface)\
**Post date:** [28 September 2024 09:45 UTC](https://community.investengine.com/t/spdr-msci-acwi-all-world-fund-now-available/1892/2 "2024-09-28T09:45:46Z")

</div>

Have you looked at XLKQ as a technology fund it’s cheaper than XNAQ and performed better over the long term.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gandalf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/59ef9b/32.png) [@Gandalf](https://community.investengine.com/u/Gandalf)\
**Post date:** [28 September 2024 09:51 UTC](https://community.investengine.com/t/spdr-msci-acwi-all-world-fund-now-available/1892/3 "2024-09-28T09:51:26Z")

</div>

Yes but it has very low volume  
I prefer the NASDAQ because it’s not just a tech fund, but is more an innovation fund with different sectors, thus slightly more diverse than pure tech funds  
If I Iinvest in a pure tech fund it’s usually IITU

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scarface](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e56c9b/32.png) [@Scarface](https://community.investengine.com/u/Scarface)\
**Post date:** [28 September 2024 10:07 UTC](https://community.investengine.com/t/spdr-msci-acwi-all-world-fund-now-available/1892/4 "2024-09-28T10:07:01Z")

</div>

XLKQ has performed better than IITU also over the last 5yrs and it’s marginally cheaper.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveB](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ea666f/32.png) [@SteveB](https://community.investengine.com/u/SteveB)\
**Post date:** [28 September 2024 20:44 UTC](https://community.investengine.com/t/spdr-msci-acwi-all-world-fund-now-available/1892/5 "2024-09-28T20:44:20Z")

</div>

I don’t like the fact XLKQ is synthetic and you don’t own the underlying assets.  
I actually own both XLKQ and IITU, to see exactly how the performance differs, and I think I might stick with IITU.

What do you think of LGGG at 0.1%? 🤓

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![djwoody](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/77aa72/32.png) [@djwoody](https://community.investengine.com/u/djwoody)\
**Post date:** [29 September 2024 07:48 UTC](https://community.investengine.com/t/spdr-msci-acwi-all-world-fund-now-available/1892/7 "2024-09-29T07:48:38Z")

</div>

I’ve noticed the ACWI fund that is on IE is showing different weightings compared to what the fund should have.  
For example, Nvidia is showing as a weight of 1.7% where it should be around the 3.9% mark.  
Does anyone know why this is?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gandalf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/59ef9b/32.png) [@Gandalf](https://community.investengine.com/u/Gandalf)\
**Post date:** [29 September 2024 08:17 UTC](https://community.investengine.com/t/spdr-msci-acwi-all-world-fund-now-available/1892/8 "2024-09-29T08:17:29Z")

</div>

LGGG doesn’t include emerging markets. I think if your going global then you have to include these. XLKQ…I don’t buy synthetic funds either

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveB](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ea666f/32.png) [@SteveB](https://community.investengine.com/u/SteveB)\
**Post date:** [11 October 2024 01:51 UTC](https://community.investengine.com/t/spdr-msci-acwi-all-world-fund-now-available/1892/10 "2024-10-11T01:51:04Z")

</div>

I have FWRG and its doing okay.  
I also have JGRE which isn’t doing too bad either.

But I heard someone talk about developed vs emerging markets, and something they said resonated with me. By the time emerging markets bear any fruit I’ll be an old man, and when they do they’ll be shifted over into the developed world anyway… I think? 🤷🏻‍♂️

Plus I like the fact LGGG costs only 0.1%

Admittedly ACWI has been performing ever so slightly better up to the 6-month mark, but then LGGG beats ACWI up to the 3 year mark and beyond. JGRE seems to dominate both, but at a TER of 0.25%

 ![IMG_5202](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/uploads/investengine/original/2X/6/6ea10dcbd181cf1556390f6f82782a98f0e8f272.jpeg)  
 ![IMG_5200](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/uploads/investengine/original/2X/4/45f61db35bae9c42aadda1105e734216ee488427.jpeg)
