The link doesn’t seem to work for me, so not sure what’s in your portfolio. A world fund would be easier, but you could produce your own from multiple funds as long as you are happy to rebalance occasionally. Make sure you are including large, mid and small cap from the developed world according to their global weighting, as well as some emerging markets.
It’s a good portfolio and will serve you well, but some points:
Are you looking to accurately recreate DIY a global tracker fund? If so:
UK stocks are included in the Lyxor Europe fund from what I remember (as I used to use it) - so having the FTSE 100 also doubles up UK exposure
You’re missing an Asian Pacific fund
Amundi Prime Global covers world developed markets, and very cheaply too at 0.04% including transaction fees. This is both cheaper and easier than managing and rebalancing more funds. I now use this and added emerging markets and a small cap fund to track global markets as closely and cheaply as possible
you’ve got commodities for another asset class and are considering gold, but also consider REITS as you get little exposure to them through global tracker funds.
I was not looking to recreate a global tracker fund, but in the end it happened to be so.
That’s what prompted me to ask if I could use a single fund against so many and save on costs as well.
My other reasoning was to separate the regions, so the risks are isolated and maximise regional growth instead of having a single global fund (which averages out). I do not know if this is a valid statement, so will try to experiment this with a small amount
I was not aware of the double UK exposure, in that case, I will rebalance FTSE 100 to zero and keep the Lyxor Europe.