Cheapest MSCI All- World Accumulating Index tracker now available, OCF of 0.12% and a typical spread of 0.05%.
Next competitive fund is Invesco Ftse All-World with an OCF of 0.15%.
I am going to add this to my VUAG and XNAQ and FWRG unds, to hedge my bets. Fund overlap doesn’t concern me, strong returns do.
1 Like
Have you looked at XLKQ as a technology fund it’s cheaper than XNAQ and performed better over the long term.
Yes but it has very low volume
I prefer the NASDAQ because it’s not just a tech fund, but is more an innovation fund with different sectors, thus slightly more diverse than pure tech funds
If I Iinvest in a pure tech fund it’s usually IITU
1 Like
XLKQ has performed better than IITU also over the last 5yrs and it’s marginally cheaper.
I don’t like the fact XLKQ is synthetic and you don’t own the underlying assets.
I actually own both XLKQ and IITU, to see exactly how the performance differs, and I think I might stick with IITU.
What do you think of LGGG at 0.1%? 
1 Like
I’ve noticed the ACWI fund that is on IE is showing different weightings compared to what the fund should have.
For example, Nvidia is showing as a weight of 1.7% where it should be around the 3.9% mark.
Does anyone know why this is?
LGGG doesn’t include emerging markets. I think if your going global then you have to include these. XLKQ…I don’t buy synthetic funds either
1 Like
I have FWRG and its doing okay.
I also have JGRE which isn’t doing too bad either.
But I heard someone talk about developed vs emerging markets, and something they said resonated with me. By the time emerging markets bear any fruit I’ll be an old man, and when they do they’ll be shifted over into the developed world anyway… I think? 
Plus I like the fact LGGG costs only 0.1%
Admittedly ACWI has been performing ever so slightly better up to the 6-month mark, but then LGGG beats ACWI up to the 3 year mark and beyond. JGRE seems to dominate both, but at a TER of 0.25%
